Fronteras de delegación cognitiva con inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior: síntesis sistemática focalizada

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

aprendizaje, enseñanza superior, inteligencia artificial, pensamiento crítico, plan de estudios universitarios

Resumen

La inteligencia artificial generativa puede asumir operaciones que en educación superior funcionan como actividades de aprendizaje y evidencias de competencia, lo que exige delimitar su delegación cognitiva. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar la evidencia empírica sobre GenAI y aprendizaje universitario, identificar configuraciones humano–IA y derivar criterios curriculares mediante el marco Fronteras de Delegación Cognitiva para la Reconfiguración Curricular (FDC-RC). Se realizó una síntesis sistemática focalizada, reportada con PRISMA 2020 y PRISMA-S y valorada con MMAT 2018. De 1.745 registros identificados, se priorizaron 50 candidatos; se recuperaron 41 reportes y 39 estudios integraron la síntesis. Como resultado se pudo identificar que la mayoría de los registros se publicó entre 2025 y 2026. Los beneficios fueron más consistentes con retroalimentación, andamiaje, indagación, diálogo socrático y verificación humana; la dependencia y sustitución cognitiva mostraron riesgos. Se concluye que la FDC-RC distingue actividades no delegables, aumentables, estratégicamente delegables y de evidencia indeterminada, aunque requiere validación prospectiva.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abdelhalim, S. M. & Almaneea, M. O. (2026). GenAI-supported collaborative project-based language learning: Effects on EFL undergraduates’ achievement and autonomy. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 11, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-026-00430-8

Ajlouni, A., AlOmary, A., Wahbeh, F., Ghnaim, F. & Al-orainat, L. (2026). The impact of ChatGPT usage intensity on mathematics anxiety and problem-solving skills among undergraduate students. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 16(2), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v16i2.60901

Aydemir Arslan, M., Arpacik, Ö., Kucuk, C. S. & Yildiz Durak, H. (2026). Beyond the screen: Exploring the impact of GenAI-supported online learning on interaction, motivation, and self-regulation in higher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2026.2643173

Avello-Martínez, R., Gajderowicz, T. & Gómez-Rodríguez, V. G. (2024). Is ChatGPT helpful for graduate students in acquiring knowledge about digital storytelling and reducing their cognitive load? An experiment. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 24(78), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.604621

Baines, S., Patrao, A., Zhupa, X., Gramcheva, L., Paskalev, V. & Otermans, P. C. J. (2026). Evaluating the impact of ChatGPT on student performance in academic writing. International Journal of Technology in Education, 9(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.5150

Beimel, D., Amzalag, M., Zviel-Girshin, R. & Voloch, N. (2025). Blending generative AI and instructor-led learning: Empirical insights on student motivation, learning experience, and academic performance in higher education. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111480

Chan, S. T. S., Lo, N. P. K., & Wong, A. M. H. (2024). Enhancing university level English proficiency with generative AI: Empirical insights into automated feedback and learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep541. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15607

Chu, H.-C., Yin, C. & Chang, C.-Y. (2026). Effects of GenAI-assisted 5E inquiry-based learning on university students’ problem-solving skills, service planning competencies, and self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-14076-z

Elzeky, M. E. H., Alanazi, S. & Shahine, N. F. M. (2026). Association between ChatGPT reliance, self-directed learning, and problem-solving competencies among nursing students: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy in an analytical cross-sectional design. Nursing Forum, 2026, Article 3301894. https://doi.org/10.1155/nuf/3301894

Erlangga, S. Y., Sarwanto, & Harlita. (2026). Unpacking the cognitive and ethical pathways of generative AI tools in higher education: A PLS-SEM study of learning performance mediation and moderation effects. Research in Learning Technology, 34, Article 3563. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v34.3563

Higashitsuji, A., Otsuka, T. & Watanabe, K. (2025). Impact of ChatGPT on case creation efficiency and learning quality in case-based learning for undergraduate nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 20(1), e159–e166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.10.002

Isaeva, R., Caner, H. N., Caner, M., Giray, L. & Karadag, E. (2026). Students’ engagement with generative AI in academic learning: A self-determination theory and epistemic network analysis study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, Article 100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100606

Kannangara, D. & Yatigammana, K. (2026). Leveraging ChatGPT to enhance problem-solving skills and technology acceptance among undergraduates: An exploratory experimental study in Sri Lankan higher education. Cogent Education, 13(1), Article 2703353. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2703353

Kazanidis, I. & Pellas, N. (2024). Harnessing generative artificial intelligence for digital literacy innovation: A comparative study between early childhood education and computer science undergraduates. AI, 5(3), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5030068

Lee, J., Hung, J.-T., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Popescu, D., Cui, C. Z., Grigoryan, G., Joyner, D. A. & Harmon, S. W. (2026). Socratic Mind: Impact of a novel GenAI-powered formative assessment tool on student learning and higher-order thinking. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-026-10007-6

Li, H.-F. (2023). Effects of a ChatGPT-based flipped learning guiding approach on learners’ courseware project performances and perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8923

Li, H., Xiao, L., Lu, K., Li, D., Zhang, Z. & Xia, Q. (2026). Exploring the application of large language models (LLMs) in data structure instruction: An empirical analysis of student learning outcomes in computer science. Information, 17(4), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17040353

Lu, Q., Yao, Y., Xiao, L., Zhu, X. & Yin, H. (2026). Can GenAI help undergraduate students become independent writers? An intervention study on its effects on writing motivation, feedback literacy, and self-regulated learning strategies. Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2026.2654526

Ma, L., Zheng, X. & Zhou, X. (2026). Portraits of student types using GenAI-assisted learning: An empirical study based on a survey of undergraduates from 20 higher education institutions in China. Frontiers of Education in China, 21(2), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-021-026-0008-9

Morán, F. E., Moran Peña, F. & Bravo Parrales, E. P. (2026). Potenciando el pensamiento creativo del estudiante: Un nuevo enfoque basado en la inteligencia artificial generativa y su impacto en el rendimiento académico. Revista Prisma Social, (54), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6245

Nasr, N. R., Tu, C.-H., Werner, J., Bauer, T., Yen, C.-J. & Sujo-Montes, L. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative AI ChatGPT on critical thinking in higher education: Passive AI-directed use or human–AI supported collaboration? Education Sciences, 15(9), 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091198

Pellas, N. (2025). The role of students’ higher-order thinking skills in the relationship between academic achievements and machine learning using generative AI chatbots. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20036

Polakova, P. & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Qi, J., Xu, Y., Liu, J. & Xue, K. (2025). The impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on college students’ critical thinking and autonomous learning ability. Frontiers of Education in China, 20(4), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-020-025-0021-0

Rahman, G., Almutairi, E. A. A., Almutairi, M. & Mudhsh, B. A. (2025). The impact of AI-powered text generation tools on the critical thinking skills of undergraduate students. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.53761/srkt0510

Revesai, Z. (2025). Generative AI dependency: The emerging academic crisis and its impact on student performance—a case study of a university in Zimbabwe. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2549787. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2549787

Riztha, F., Wickramarachchi, R., Asanka, P. P. G. D. & Dissanayake, M. A. (2026). Evaluating the impact of large language models on problem-solving skills in programming debugging of IT undergraduates. Cogent Education, 13(1), Article 2658267. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2658267

Selem, K. M., Saghier, E. G., Khreis, S. H. A. & Tan, C. C. (2025). ChatGPT-related risk patterns and students’ creative thinking toward tourism statistics course: Pretest and posttest quasi-experimentation. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 37(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2025.2456638

Sezgunsay, E., Polat, A. B. & Kılıcer, S. B. (2026). Integrating ChatGPT into nursing education: A randomized trial exploring knowledge, retention, and student perspectives on endotracheal suctioning. BMC Medical Education, 26, Article 1148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09483-2

Supriadi, N. & Suherman, S. (2026). Integration of generative AI in creative mathematics learning: A correlational analysis between the quality of prompts and the logical reasoning of student teachers in the education degree programme. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 26(84). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.716941

Tichá, M. & Přibyl, J. (2026). LLM use during exam preparation and student performance in university mathematics: A quantitative observational study. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1875391. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1875391

Velasco-Bartolome, E. & Ruiz-Campo, S. (2026). Inteligencia artificial generativa, esfuerzo percibido y pensamiento crítico: Evidencias de un estudio experimental con ChatGPT en educación superior. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa–RELATEC, 25(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.25.2.201

Vo, T. L., & Ho, T. M. P. (2026). A quasi-experimental study on enhancing EFL learners’ grammar precision in writing skills under supported-ChatGPT approach at a university in a remote region of Vietnam. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence (3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/A3.23

Wu, X.-Y. & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). Integrating learner characteristics and generative AI affordances to enhance self-regulated learning: A configurational analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 14, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-025-00028-x

Xu, S., Rahim, N. & Zeng, S. (2026). The application of generative AI in university dance education: Effects on dance skills, engagement and learning motivation. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1756945. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1756945

Yao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, S. & Zhu, X. (2025). A qualitative inquiry into metacognitive strategies of postgraduate students in employing ChatGPT for English academic writing. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12824. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12824

Yildiz Durak, H., Kaya, D. & Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2025). GenAI as metacognitive scaffolding in flipped classrooms: Impact on learner outcomes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2574456

Zhang, W., Chen, B. & Tang, C. (2026). An empirical study on the impact of generative artificial intelligence-based learning activities on college students’ deep learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 21, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2026.21028

Zhang, Z., Kanji, M., Zhang, M. & Zhou, Y. (2026). Learning-oriented generative AI use, self-directed learning, and learning anxiety in higher education: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1840953. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1840953

Descargas

Publicado

2026-08-29

Cómo citar

Tejeda Díaz, R., Guzmán Ramírez, A. C., Vargas Prias, G. D., Cevallos Arteaga, C. A., Ponce Martínez, R. I., & Ponce Solórzano, H. X. (2026). Fronteras de delegación cognitiva con inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior: síntesis sistemática focalizada. Estudios Del Desarrollo Social: Cuba Y América Latina, 14, 1856–1874. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.uh.cu/revflacso/article/view/12991

Número

Sección

Artículos originales
Share |

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a