MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REGULATIONS LEGAL FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY IN ECUADOR: UN NEUTROSOPHIC APPROACH WITH METHODS TODIM AND PROMETHEE

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making is prevalent across various life domains, marked by significant complexity in identifying
viable solutions. This challenge becomes more pronounced in the context of individual rights, particularly for persons with
disabilities. In Ecuador, despite the state's inclusive policies for this group, discrimination issues persist, even though they
are part of the priority attention grou This study evaluates the effectiveness of legal regulations for people with disabilities
using multi-criteria evaluation techniques. The TODIM and PROMETHEE methods were utilized, along with single-value
neutrosophic sets based on neutrosophic logic, to appropriately handle indeterminate and inconsistent information typical of
real-world scenarios. This approach demonstrates the efficacy of these techniques in solving complex real-life problems
across various social sectors.